AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

SPENCER SHILLINGFORD et al., Respondents, v. ALBERT G. ECKERT et al., Appellants.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated January 18, 1979, which granted plaintiffs' motion for leave to serve and file an amended bill of particulars. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. The amended bill of particulars does not seek to set forth new injuries, but merely expands upon "continuing * * * disabilities" alleged in the original bill of particulars. Thus, plaintiffs had a right to serve this amended bill of particulars (see CPLR 3043, subd [b]; L 1979, ch 590). Mollen, P.J., Titone, O'Connor, Cohalan and Margett, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SHILLINGFORD v. ECKERT
(Dec 3, 1979)