AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates

In the Matter of SLATTERY ASSOCIATES, INC., Appellant, v. JAMES H. TULLY, JR., et al., Constituting the State Tax Commission, Respondents.

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

With respect to the piping we do not reach any question of inconsistency with other commission rulings since the complaint alleged, petitioner's expert testified and the hearing officer found that the piping was furnished to petitioner by the owner. As to the piping, therefore, petitioner, having paid no tax, has no right to a credit. As concerns the other materials used to construct the generator foundation, we concur with the reasoning of the Appellate Division memorandum ( 79 A.D.2d 761).

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF SLATTERY ASSOCIATES v. TULLY
(Jul 6, 1981)