AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

HIGH POINT SPRINKLER COMPANY OF ATLANTA, INC. et al. v. GEORGE HYMAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY et al.

BANKE, Judge.

This is an appeal by the defendants from a judgment for the plaintiff contractor in a suit to recover for breach of a subcontract. The case was tried without a jury. In ruling for the plaintiff, the court made no findings of fact, but merely concluded as a matter of law that the contract was valid, that the defendants were bound by it, and that the plaintiff had incurred $80,374.30 in damages as the result of the defendants' failure to perform. Held:

The judgment is vacated and the case remanded for entry of proper findings of fact and conclusions of law as to all material issues, as required by Code Ann. § 81A-152 (a). See Doyal Development Co. v. Blair, 234 Ga. 261 ( 215 S.E.2d 471) (1975); Spivey v. Mayson, 124 Ga. App. 775 ( 186 S.E.2d 154) (1971); Barkwell v. Helms, 137 Ga. App. 290 ( 223 S.E.2d 485) (1976).

Judgment vacated and case remanded. Deen, P. J., and Carley, J., concur.

DECIDED OCTOBER 27, 1981.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HIGH POINT SPRINK., ATLANTA v. GEORGE HYMAN CONSTR
(Oct 27, 1981)