Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates

CHLOE PREMO, Appellant, v. DONALD CORNELL et al., Respondents.

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rule of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.2 [b]), order affirmed, with costs. It cannot be said, as a matter of law, that the Appellate Division abused its discretion in granting defendants' motion to dismiss the action pursuant to CPLR 3012 (subd [b]). Indeed, as we held in Barasch v Micucci ( 49 N.Y.2d 594, 600-601), it would have been an abuse of discretion to have failed to dismiss.

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PREMO v. CORNELL
(Feb 16, 1982)