Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates

Da v. d MATTSON, Respondent,

OPINION

WOZNIAK, Judge.

Continental Insurance Company argues that, since the legislature has repealed the underinsured motorist coverage section of the No-Fault Act, they are free to exclude stacking of benefits. In Sobania v. Integrity Mutual Insurance Co., 349 N.W.2d 345 (Minn.Ct.App. 1984), this court held that the repeal did not change the nature of underinsured motorist coverage and, therefore, attempted "anti-stacking" exclusions, such as the one in this case, are void.

DECISION

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTSON v. CONTINENTAL INS. CO
(Jun 19, 1984)