Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

PREFERRED RISK INSURANCE COMPANY v. BOYKIN.

ORDER OF COURT.

Upon consideration of the application for certiorari filed to review the judgment of the Court of Appeals in this case, it is ordered that the writ be hereby denied.

All the Justices concur, except Smith, J., who dissents.

ORDERED MAY 1, 1985.

SMITH, Justice, dissenting.

I would grant the application for certiorari in this case and reverse the principle of law in Georgia that one cannot recover exemplary damages unless general, actual or compensatory damages are found. "The legal doctrine of punitive damages is founded in the theory that certain intentional acts should be punished or deterred. Punishment and deterrence concern behavior that society finds undesirable. Punishment and deterrence are not related to actual or compensatory damages. Punitive damages are not to compensate an injured party, but to give bad actors a legal spanking." Lane County v. Wood, 298 Or. 191 ( 691 P.2d 473) (Or. 1984).

This principle is supported in many other jurisdictions in the United States. For this reason, I would grant and reverse.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PREFERRED RISK INSURANCE COMPANY v. BOYKIN
(May 1, 1985)