AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

In the Matter of ALAN KANE, Petitioner. HAROLD FREEDMAN et al., Appellants; IRVING TENENBAUM, Respondent.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs to the appellants payable by the receiver, the appellants' motion is granted to the extent that the order dated August 22, 1984, is vacated, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, for an accounting and a calculation of statutorily fixed receivership commissions, and, upon the conclusion of the accounting, a determination on that branch of the motion which was for leave to commence an action against the receiver.

Despite a stipulation of the parties, the court was without the authority to allow the receiver compensation in excess of the maximum receivership commission provided for by Business Corporation Law § 1217 (see, Hirsch v. Peekskill Ranch, 100 A.D.2d 863; Rinaud v. Home Shares Corp., 115 N.Y.S.2d 425). The Legislature has seen fit to set ceilings on the amounts that receivers, as court-appointed officers, may be awarded for their services and it is not within the province of parties to stipulate, nor within the discretion of the court to accept stipulations to a greater amount.

Therefore, we remit the matter to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, for further proceedings, including an accounting and, upon the conclusion of the accounting, a determination on that branch of the motion which was for leave to commence an action against the receiver. Thompson, J.P., Bracken, Brown and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF KANE
(Jul 13, 1987)