Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates
Judges

Francis J. Catania, et al., Plaintiffs v. Commonwealth of Pennsyl

OPINION BY JUDGE BARRY, July 27, 1987:

Richard B. Klein has filed a petition for enforcement under this Court's original jurisdiction. 42 Pa. C. S. § 761. He maintains that the State Employees' Retirement Board has unlawfully refused to grant him certain benefits he is entitled to receive pursuant to a consent decree entered into by members of the class in the case of Catania v. State Employees' Retirement Board, 71 Pa. Commw. 393, 455 A.2d 1250 (1983).

The Board has filed preliminary objections maintaining that this Court lacks original jurisdiction in this matter because Klein has filed an appeal from the Board's decision on this exact issue and that appeal is properly within our appellate jurisdiction. 42 Pa. C. S. § 763.

Because we have addressed the same issues in Klein's appeal from the Board's adjudication, at Klein v. State Employees' Retirement Board, 108 Pa. Commw. 39, 528 A.2d 1071 (1987), which case is dispositive of the present action, we sustain the Board's preliminary objections.

ORDER

NOW, July 27, 1987, the preliminary objections of the State Employees' Retirement Board are sustained and the above action is dismissed.

Judge MacPHAIL did not participate in the decision in this case.

Judge DOYLE concurs in the result only.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CATANIA et al. v. STATE EMP. RET. BD
(Jul 27, 1987)