JOHNSON v. HENDRICKS

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

Nos. 85-2708 to 85-2720.

Attorney(S)

Gerald L. Bader, Jr. (Pamela N. Hultin, and Ann L. Duckett with him on the brief), Bader Cox, Denver, Colo., for plaintiff-appellant. Stuart N. Bennett (Mark J. Appelton, Roath Brega, P.C., Denver, Colo., Shannon A. Robinson and Lynda H. Knowles, Richard J. Spelts, P.C., Denver, Colo., James R. Figg, Warkentine, Figg Gerdes, Broomfield, Colo., J. Lawrence Hamil and Richard C. Morris, Hamil Professional Corp., Denver, Colo., Craig D. Joyce, Walters Theis, Denver, Colo., Maurice Reuler and Robert W. Becker, Mason, Reuler and Peek Professional Corp., Denver, Colo., John A. Studholme and Fred W. Clifford, Boulder, Colo., Jeffrey L. Smith and Sheldon L. Abramson, Cohen Brame Smith, Denver, Colo., with him on the briefs), Roath Brega, P.C., Denver, Colo., for defendants-appellees.

Judges

Stephanie Kulp Seymour

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

JAMES P. JOHNSON, AS EQUITY RECEIVER TO COLLECT ASSETS, ON BEHALF OF THE CLAIMANTS OF CHILCOTT COMMODITIES CORPORATION, CHILCOTT PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, INC., THOMAS D. CHILCOTT, D/B/A CHILCOTT FUTURES FUND, THOMAS D. CHILCOTT, AND CHILCOTT FUTURES FUND, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. DON R. HENDRICKS AND BETTY M. HENDRICKS; GARY K. HILGERS AND DONA M. HILGERS; RICHARD R. AND DELORES GRENFELL; VESTA E. DILTS; CHESTER D. HUFFMIRE AND SHIRLEY J. HUFFMIRE; JOHN T. AND ANNIS L. DOTO; CHARLES V. ROTH, JR.; MALVIN M. KRINSKY AND FLORENCE KRINSKY; LAWRENCE W. SADIL AND VIRGINIA R. SADIL; ELIZABETH A. DEMAREE, M.E. DEMAREE AND D.C. DEMAREE; ROSEMARIE E. SPRAGUE; JOSEPH STUDHOLME AND RENEBELLE B. STUDHOLME; AND CHARLES H. POPE, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES.

SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.

This action was brought by James P. Johnson, as equity receiver on behalf of the claimants of Chilcott Commodities Corporation and various other entities, to recover amounts paid to investors in excess of their contributions. The district court granted defendant investors' motions to dismiss. Johnson v. Studholme, 619 F. Supp. 1347 (D.Colo. 1985). The receiver has appealed.

We affirm substantially for the reasons given by the trial court. We are not persuaded that any of the arguments made on appeal by the receiver undermine the conclusions reached by that court.

AFFIRMED.

Comments