Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's claim on appeal that the complainant chose him out of a lineup because he was wearing distinctive clothing was not raised before the hearing court and is therefore not preserved for our review (see, People v. Rogers, 135 A.D.2d 588, lv denied 71 N.Y.2d 902). In any event, based upon our review of the record, we find that the hearing court properly determined that the lineup was not unduly suggestive.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15).
In addition, we find that the sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).
We have examined the defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Mangano, J.P., Lawrence, Kooper and Sullivan, JJ., concur.