Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

I. LAWRENCE BRIL, ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. SUSAN G. FURMAN, APPELLEE.

PER CURIAM.

Counsel for respective parties have conceded that the money judgment awarded Ms. Furman was miscalculated. Consequently, the final judgment is vacated with directions for the trial court to reduce the principal sum of the judgment in the amount of $419, and to recalculate interest accordingly. In all other respects, the judgment, as modified, is affirmed.

Affirmed in part, vacated in part and remanded.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BRIL v. FURMAN
(Oct 9, 1989)