AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

RAILWAY LABOR EXECUTIVES' ASSOCIATION, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. CITY OF GALVESTON, TEXAS, ACTING BY AND THROUGH THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE GALVESTON WHARVES, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES.

ALVIN B. RUBIN, Circuit Judge:

Because the pendency of the interlocutory appeal from the district court's judgment denying the preliminary injunction did not divest the district court of jurisdiction to proceed with other aspects of the case, that court did not act improperly in considering the plaintiff's petition for a permanent injunction. For the reasons given in Railway Labor Executives' Association v. City of Galveston, 897 F.2d 164 (5th Cir. 1990), we affirm the district court's judgment denying that petition.

See Fed.R.Civ.P. 62(c); Plaquemines Parish Comm'n Council v. United States, 416 F.2d 952, 954 (5th Cir. 1969); 11 C. Wright A. Miller, Federal Practice Procedure § 2962, at 631-32 (1973).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

RAILWAY LABOR EXECUTIVES v. CITY OF GALVESTON
(Apr 18, 1990)