AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

In the Matter of the Claim of MACKSON KINARD, Respondent, v. BATTLE VERZENI CONSTRUCTION COMPANY et al., Appellants. WORKERS' COMPENSATION BOARD, Respondent.

Casey, J.

The employer, Battle Verzeni Construction Company, contends that the Workers' Compensation Board's finding of a causally related disability is not supported by substantial evidence. In particular, the employer points to certain alleged inconsistencies and asserts that the testimony of claimant's expert is incredible as a matter of law. Based upon our review of the record, however, we agree with the Board that the claimed inconsistencies, together with the conflicting opinion of the employer's expert, created a factual question of credibility which was for the Board to resolve (see, e.g., Matter of Film v Holmes Transp., 147 A.D.2d 831). We also find no merit in the employer's argument that the Board could not award an appearance fee to claimant's medical expert (see, 12 NYCRR 301.1).

Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workers' Compensation Board. Mahoney, P.J., Casey, Weiss, Levine and Harvey, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF KINARD v. BATTLE VERZENI CONSTR
(Apr 26, 1990)