Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

WILLIAM FRANKLIN PROBST, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA, APPELLEE.

ORDER GRANTING PETITION FOR REHEARING

The State of Oklahoma has filed a Petition for Rehearing asking that the Court clarify certain language set forth in the opinion handed down herein on September 9, 1991. Now on this 1st day of November, 1991, having examined the Petition for Rehearing filed by the State of Oklahoma in the above styled and numbered cause, and being fully advised in the premises, this Court finds that clarification of certain language concerning statutory construction is necessary and that the petition should be, and is hereby GRANTED.

The clarification required does not change the ultimate disposition of the case. However, to avoid unnecessary confusion the original opinion handed down in the above styled and numbered cause is hereby WITHDRAWN.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ James F. Lane JAMES F. LANE

Presiding Judge

/s/ Gary Lumpkin GARY LUMPKIN

Vice Presiding Judge

/s/ Tom Brett TOM BRETT

Judge

/s/ Ed Parks ED PARKS,

Judge

/s/ Charles A. Johnson CHARLES A. JOHNSON,

Judge

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PROBST v. STATE
(Nov 1, 1991)