Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the presentment agency (see, Matter of David H., 69 N.Y.2d 792, 793), we find that it was legally sufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the appellant committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crimes of inciting to riot and resisting arrest (see, Penal Law § 240.08, 205.30 Penal).
We have examined the appellant's remaining contention and find that it is without merit. Kunzeman, J.P., Eiber, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.