Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER, v. FELICE JOHN VEACH, RESPONDENT.

PER CURIAM.

We review Veach v. State, 614 So.2d 680 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993), based on conflict with Preston v. State, 411 So.2d 297 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 418 So.2d 1280 (Fla. 1982). We have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(3) of the Florida Constitution.

We recently resolved this conflict with our decisions in Sirmons v. State, 620 So.2d 1249 (Fla. 1993), and Troutman v. State, 630 So.2d 528 (Fla. 1993). On authority of Sirmons and Troutman we approve the First District's decision in Veach and approve the opinion under review.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDONALD, SHAW, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. VEACH
(Feb 3, 1994)