AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. KHALIL SUMPTER, Appellant.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant fired two gunshots, with each bullet killing a separate victim. Although the shots were fired in rapid succession, and were part of the same transaction, the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in imposing consecutive sentences since the defendant committed separate acts neither of which was a material element of the other (see, Penal Law § 70.25; People v Brown, 80 N.Y.2d 361; People v Brathwaite, 63 N.Y.2d 839; People v Scandell, 143 A.D.2d 423, cert denied 489 U.S. 1080). In addition, the sentences imposed were not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80). Mangano, P.J., Balletta, O'Brien, Hart and Florio, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. SUMPTER
(Apr 25, 1994)