AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

HOME INDEMNITY COMPANY, Appellant, v. DAVID REID et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, with costs, the plaintiffs' motion is granted, the cross motion is denied and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, for entry of a judgment declaring that the plaintiff is not obligated to pay any additional amount toward post-judgment interest beyond the $89,062.50 it has previously paid to the defendants.

Neither the relevant language contained in the insurance policy issued by the plaintiff Home Indemnity Company (hereinafter Home) nor the terms of 11 NYCRR 60-1.1 (b) require that Home pay any post-judgment interest which is based on that portion of the underlying judgment which exceeds the limits of Home's policy (see, Dingle v. Prudential Prop. Cas. Ins. Co., 85 N.Y.2d 657, affg 203 A.D.2d 512; see also, Shnarch v. Empire Mut. Ins. Co., 144 A.D.2d 795; Holubetz v. National Fire Ins. Co., 13 A.D.2d 228; Coveney v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., 58 Misc.2d 480, affd 33 A.D.2d 992; Home Indem Co. v. Corie, 206 Misc. 720, affd 286 App. Div. 996). Mangano, P.J., Bracken, Altman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HOME INDEMNITY COMPANY v. REID
(Jun 26, 1995)