Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

CRITERION INTERESTS, INC., an Oregon corporation, and the Conser v. tion Fund, a Maryland non-profit corporation, Respondents,

DEITS, P.J.

Reconsideration granted; opinion modified and adhered to as modified.

DEITS, P.J.

Defendant moves for reconsideration of our opinion. 136 Or. App. 239, 902 P.2d 110 (1995). Among its arguments is that our statement that "[d]efendant does not assert that the deed is not an integrated writing," id. at 245 n 4, is factually inaccurate. The statement does not precisely capture our intended meaning. We correct it to read: "Defendant makes no argument that the deed is not an integrated writing, except an implicit argument that depends for its success on the correctness of other arguments that defendant makes."

We have considered and reject the other contentions in the motion.

Reconsideration granted; opinion modified and adhered to as modified.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CRITERION INTERESTS INC. v. THE DESCHUTES CLUB
(Jan 23, 1996)