Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

RUSSELL CALAMIA, Petitioner, vs. HARRY K. SINGLETARY, JR., Respondent. JEFFREY LYNN HOCK, Petitioner, vs. HARRY K. SINGLETARY, JR. Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

On petition for writ of certiorari, the United States Supreme Court vacated our previous decision in this cause and remanded the case for further consideration in light of its decision in Lynce v. Mathis, 117 S.Ct. 891 (1997). Calamia v. Singletary, 117 S.Ct. 1309 (1997). In view of the holding ofLynce, we grant the petition for writ of habeas corpus of Russell Calamia and the petition for writ of mandamus of Jeffrey Lynn Hock. We direct respondent to reinstate the petitioners' administrative and provisional gain time in accordance with the opinion in Lynce v. Mathis.

Calamia v. Singletary, 686 So.2d 1337 (Fla. 1996).

It is so ordered.

KOGAN, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, GRIMES, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CALAMIA v. SINGLETARY
(May 22, 1997)