The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. We see no reason to disturb the credibility determinations of the jury ( see, People v Gaimari, 176 N.Y. 84, 94).
Defendant's contention that the trial court erred in permitting the prosecutor to elicit testimony about prior uncharged crimes is without merit, since the testimony at issue served to complete the narrative of events and to explain the relationship that developed between defendant and the witness to whom defendant confided details about the intended and actual shooting ( People v. Bernard, 224 A.D.2d 192, lv denied 88 N.Y.2d 964).
We perceive no abuse of sentencing discretion.
We have considered defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit.
Concur — Wallach, J.P., Nardelli, Rubin, Tom and Andrias, JJ.