AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

JOSEPH PINTO, APPELLANT, v. EMC MORTGAGE CORPORATION, APPELLEE.

PARIENTE, J.

We affirm the trial court's judgment of reforeclosure in favor of appellee, EMC Mortgage. However, we reverse the amount of the judgment. See Tejedo v. Secretary of Veteran Affairs, 673 So.2d 959 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996). Appellant, Pinto, is entitled to pay the redemption amount he would have been required to pay if he had been joined in the first foreclosure and had elected to redeem promptly upon the filing of the first foreclosure. See Quinn Plumbing Co. v. New Miami Shores Corp., 129 So. 690 (Fla. 1930);Thecsuccess Corp. v. Graham, 577 So.2d 590 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991);Tejedo. On remand, an amended judgment shall not include any interest or expenses incurred subsequent to the filing of the first foreclosure action. See Tejedo, 673 So.2d at 960.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART.

WARNER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PINTO v. EMC MORTGAGE CORPORATION
(Oct 1, 1997)