Plaintiff seeks to recover damages for injuries she sustained when she fell on ice while walking in defendant's parking lot some five hours after the cessation of a nine-inch snowfall and some two and a half hours after defendant's employee had plowed the lot. We agree with the trial court that plaintiff failed to make out a prima facie case. There was no proof from which the fact-finder could reasonably infer that defendant's employee, in the course of removing snow from the subject lot, either created or heightened the hazardous condition that caused plaintiff's injuries ( see, Oley v. Village of Massapequa Park, 198 A.D.2d 272; compare, Glick v. City of New York, 139 A.D.2d 402). In this connection, the trial court properly exercised its discretion when it determined that plaintiff's proposed witness lacked the breadth of experience necessary to qualify him as an expert in snow plowing ( see, Meiselman v. Crown Hgts. Hosp., 285 N.Y. 389, 398).
Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Wallach, Tom and Andrias, JJ.