Petitioner, a prison inmate, was served with a misbehavior report alleging that he violated the prison disciplinary rule prohibiting possession of weapons after three makeshift weapons were found secreted in a leg of a bed in petitioner's cell during a suspicion-based cell frisk. Petitioner challenges the determination of his guilt on several grounds, including his claim that such determination was not based upon substantial evidence. We disagree. In our view, the clear and detailed misbehavior report constitutes substantial evidence to support the alleged misconduct ( see, Matter of Foster v. Coughlin, 76 N.Y.2d 964, 966). Although petitioner denied that either he or his cell mate owned or hid the weapons, this merely presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to decide ( see, Matter of Flowers v. Barkley, 244 A.D.2d 682, 683). Thus, petitioner's assertion that he had no knowledge of the presence of the weapons concealed in the bunk "was insufficient to defeat the inference of possession that arises whenever a weapon is found in an area under an inmate's control" ( Matter of Kennedy v. Coombe, 236 A.D.2d 726; see, Matter of Fernandez v. Stinson, 251 A.D.2d 887). Petitioner's remaining contentions, including his claims of Hearing Officer bias and improper cell search and his challenge to the excessiveness of the penalty imposed, have been examined and, to the extent that they have been preserved for our review, found to be unpersuasive.
Crew III, J. P., Yesawich Jr., Peters, Spain and Graffeo, JJ., concur.
Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.