AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

THE PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. THOMAS KING, appellant. (Ind. No. 10/96)

DECISION ORDER

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this court dated March 29, 1999 (People v. King, 259 A.D.2d 763 [2d Dept., Mar. 29, 1999]) affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered April 9, 1997.

ORDERED that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see, Jones v. Barnes, 463 U.S. 745 ).

O'BRIEN, J.P., FRIEDMANN, FLORIO, and McGINITY, JJ., concur.

DECISION ORDER ON MOTION

Motion by the appellant for reargument of an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered April 9, 1997, which was determined by decision and order of this court dated March 29, 1999.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that the motion is denied.

O'BRIEN, J.P., FRIEDMANN, FLORIO, and McGINITY, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. KING
(Nov 8, 1999)