Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

IN RE THE COMMITMENT OF WILBERT L. THOMAS: STATE OF WISCONSIN, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT-PETITIONER, v. WILBERT L. THOMAS, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

¶ 1. PER CURIAM.

The court is equally divided on the question of whether the unpublished decision of the court of appeals, State v. Thomas, no. 98-0152 (Dec. 9, 1998), should be affirmed or reversed. Chief Justice SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, Justice WILLIAM A. BABLITCH and Justice ANN WALSH BRADLEY would affirm; Justice JON P. WILCOX, Justice N. PATRICK CROOKS and Justice DIANE S. SYKES would reverse. Justice DAVID T. PROSSER did not participate.

¶ 2. Accordingly, the decision of the court of appeals is affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. THOMAS
(Dec 8, 1999)