AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates
Judges

LEONARD LOBSENZER, ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. DORA L. MINTZ, ET AL., APPELLANTS.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendants failed to make a prima facie showing that they were entitled to judgment as a matter of law. There are triable issues of fact as to whether the defect in question was trivial, and, if not, whether the defendants had actual or constructive notice of the defective condition upon which plaintiff's decedent fell (see, Gordon v. American Museum of Natural History, 67 N.Y.2d 836; Roberts v. Consolidated Edison of New York, 273 A.D.2d 369; Fox v. Kamal Corp., 271 A.D.2d 485).

The defendants' remaining contentions are without merit.

BRACKEN, P.J., O'BRIEN, SMITH and COZIER, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

LOBSENZER v. MINTZ
(May 21, 2001)