AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. FRANK BARBONE, JR., appellant.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50(5) (see, People v. Conigliaro, 290 A.D.2d 87 [decided herewith]).

FEUERSTEIN, J.P., GOLDSTEIN and CRANE, JJ., concur.

FRIEDMANN, J., concurs in part and dissents and part and votes to modify the judgment by reversing the defendant's conviction of enterprise corruption, vacating the sentence imposed thereon, and dismissing that count of the indictment, with the following memorandum:

I respectfully disagree with my colleagues in the majority with respect to the defendant's conviction for enterprise corruption, and I would modify the judgment by reversing that conviction and dismissing that count of the indictment for the reasons set forth in my dissent in People v. Conigliaro (_A.D.2d [decided herewith]).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. BARBONE
(Jan 22, 2002)