DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
In opposition to the appellants' prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, the plaintiff met her burden of demonstrating the existence of a triable issue of fact with respect to whether she sustained a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d) (see Toure v. Avis Rent A Car Sys., 98 N.Y.2d 345; Stark v. Amadio, 239 A.D.2d 569; Rut v. Grigonis, 214 A.D.2d 721). While the affirmation of the plaintiff's treating physician was based upon, inter alia, the results of unsworn magnetic resonance imaging reports of the plaintiff's cervical and lumbosacral spines and left shoulder, these results were referred to by the appellants' examining neurologist and therefore, were properly before the court (see Perry v. Pagano, 267 A.D.2d 290; Raso v. Statewide Auto Auction, 262 A.D.2d 387; Pietrocola v. Battibulli, 238 A.D.2d 864, 866 n*).
ALTMAN, J.P., S. MILLER, McGINITY, SCHMIDT and RIVERA, JJ., concur.