AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

THOMAS BRITT, Appellant, v. MARIANNE NESTOR et al., Respondents.

The mere filing of luxury decontrol applications, which is expressly permitted under New York City Administrative Code § 26-504.3, is an insufficient predicate for a claim for abuse of process ( see generally Board of Educ. of Farmingdale Union Free School Dist. v. Farmingdale Classroom Teachers Assn., Local 1889, AFT AFL-CIO, 38 NY2d 397). Moreover, plaintiff failed to show how the process unlawfully interfered with his person or property ( Curiano v. Suozzi, 63 NY2d 113). As to the claim for malicious prosecution, plaintiff has failed to allege that he suffered special damages ( Campion Funeral Home v. State of New York, 166 AD2d 32, lv denied 78 NY2d 859 [1991), and, in any event, no final determination has yet been made in the underlying proceeding ( see Broughton v. State of New York, 37 NY2d 451, 459-460).

We have considered plaintiff's remaining contentions and find them without merit.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BRITT v. NESTOR
(Apr 7, 2005)