MAHONE v. WASHINGTON

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

CA 04-02986.

Attorney(S)

BURKE, ALBRIGHT, HARTER REDDY, LLP, ROCHESTER (ALEXI G. VAKICEV OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT-RESPONDENT. ALFRED P. KREMER, ROCHESTER, FOR PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS. LAW OFFICES OF LAWRENCE M. RUBIN, BUFFALO (LAWRENCE M. RUBIN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Judges

Henry J. Scudder

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

CYNTHIA MAHONE et al., Respondents-Appellants, v. CYNTHIA WASHINGTON, Appellant-Respondent, and ANTHONY J. POLITO et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: We note at the outset that Supreme Court erred in determining that the cross motion failed to comply with the requirements of CPLR 3212 (b). Rather, the record establishes that the cross motion incorporated by reference copies of the pleadings previously submitted on the initial motion for summary judgment ( see generally Matter of Board of Commrs. of Washington Park of City of Albany, 52 NY 131, 133-134). Nevertheless, we conclude that the court properly denied the cross motion because there is a triable issue of fact precluding summary judgment, and we otherwise affirm for reasons stated at Supreme Court.

CYNTHIA MAHONE et al., Respondents-Appellants, v. CYNTHIA WASHINGTON, Appellant-Respondent, and ANTHONY J. POLITO et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.

Comments