AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

DIGESTIVE LIVER DISEASE, P.C., Respondent, v. SUNIL PATEL, Respondent.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

A preliminary injunction will not be granted unless the moving party first establishes (1) a likelihood of ultimate success on the merits, (2) that irreparable injury will occur absent a preliminary injunction, and (3) a balancing of the equities favors the movant ( see CPLR 6301; W.T. Grant Co. v. Srogi, 52 NY2d 496). Where the facts are sharply disputed, those elements cannot be established and the motion for a preliminary injunction will be denied ( see Morley Distribs. v. Merinberg, 216 AD2d 544; Price Paper Twine Co. v. Miller, 182 AD2d 748; Family Affair Haircutters v. Detling, 110 AD2d 745, 747).

Here, the facts surrounding the termination of the defendant's employment from the plaintiff corporation are sharply disputed. As a result, the court could not determine that a balancing of the equities favors the plaintiff. Thus, the preliminary injunction was properly denied.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DIGESTIVE LIVER DISEASE, P.C. v. PATEL
(May 2, 2005)