AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

IN THE MATTER OF: ERIC EUGENE SHINN APRIL RENEE ROYSE-SHINN Debtors.

DECISION AND ORDER

ROBERT GRANT, Bankruptcy Judge

The notice of motion and opportunity to object which counsel for the debtors (hereinafter "Movant") served in connection with his application for compensation does not comply with the requirements of N.D. Ind. L.B.R. B-2002-2 because:

a. The notice does not correctly state the date upon which the application was filed. N.D. Ind. L.B.R. B-2002-2(c)(2). The application was filed on July 28, 2005, while the notice refers to an application filed on July 27, 2005.

Since creditors and parties in interest have not been given appropriate notice of the application and the opportunity to object thereto, the court cannot grant it at this time. Movant shall prepare and serve an Amended Notice of Motion and Opportunity to Object which complies with N.D. Ind. L.B.R. B-2002-2 and file proof thereto within fourteen (14) days of this date. See, N.D. Ind. L.B.R. B-9013-4(a). The failure to do so will result in the application being denied without prejudice and without further notice.

SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN MATTER OF SHINN
(Oct 5, 2005)