AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

In the Matter of KAREN DESTEFANO, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF COOPERATIVE EDUCATIONAL SERVICES OF NASSAU COUNTY, Respondent.

Adjudged that the petition is granted, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, without costs or disbursements, to the extent that so much of the determination as imposed a penalty terminating the petitioner's employment is annulled, the petition is otherwise denied, the proceeding is otherwise dismissed, the determination is otherwise confirmed, and the matter is remitted to the respondent for the imposition of an appropriate penalty less severe than termination of the petitioner's employment.

Contrary to the petitioner's contention, the determination that she was guilty of misconduct relating to her physical altercation with a coworker was supported by substantial evidence ( see Matter of Maher v. Cade, 15 AD3d 489; Matter of Mann v. Town of Monroe, 2 AD3d 527). However, inter alia, in light of her otherwise unblemished 14-year record of employment the penalty of termination of her employment was so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness ( see Matter of Pell v. Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale Mamaroneck, Westchester County, 34 NY2d 222). Accordingly, we grant the petition to the extent of annulling so much of the determination as imposed a penalty of termination of employment, and remit the matter to the respondent for the imposition of a penalty less severe than termination.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN THE MATTER OF DESTEFANO
(Feb 21, 2006)