Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOSEPH SWINTON, Appellant., THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent,

OPINION OF THE COURT

reducing defendants' convictions for assault in the first degree to assault in the third degree and remitting to Supreme Court for resentencing and, as so modified, affirmed. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People, the evidence is legally insufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that defendants acted with the culpable mental state of depraved indifference ( People v. Feingold, 7 NY3d 288). The evidence is legally sufficient, however, to support the jury's determination that defendants acted recklessly.

In each case: On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals ( 22 NYCRR 500.11), order modified, etc.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. JOSEPH
(Jul 6, 2006)