Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

HARLAND CANTIN, DOROTHY CANTIN, Plaintiffs v. NATURE CONSERVANCY, ROBERT BENT, CHARLES HICKEY, KRISTINA MICHELSEN, Defendants.

ORDER

J. MURTHA, District Judge

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation was filed April 9, 2007 (Paper 38). After de novo review and over objection, the Report and Recommendation is AFFIRMED, APPROVED and ADOPTED. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Defendants' motions to dismiss (Papers 13, 22 and 23) are GRANTED. Plaintiffs shall be allowed 30 days from the date of this Order to file an amended complaint. Failure to file a properly amended complaint may result in the dismissal of this case.

Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment (Paper 7) is DENIED as premature.

SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CANTIN v. NATURE CONSERVANCY
(May 1, 2007)