Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

NORMAND BEDFORD v. STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, A.T. WALL, Director, Rhode Island Department of Corrections.

Memorandum and Order

JACOB HAGOPIAN, Magistrate Judge

Presently before the Court is the motion of the pro se petitioner, Normand Bedford, to appoint counsel to represent him in this instant habeas corpus petition.

There is no constitutional right to representation by counsel in habeas corpus proceedings. Pennsylvania v. Finley, 481 U.S. 551, 107 S.Ct. 1990 (1987); Green v. Abrams, 948 F.2d 41, 46 (2nd Cir. 1993). However, counsel may be appointed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254(h) or 18 U.S.C. § 3006A and it is discretionary with the court when "the interests of justice so require." Factors to be considered include the complexity of the legal and factual issues, and the pro se litigants' ability to investigate the facts and present the claims. See Blasi v. Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 30 F. Supp.2d 481, 488 (M.D. Pa. 1998).

Here, having reviewed Bedford's petition and the motions that he has filed in this case, it is clear that he has adequately presented the facts and claims of his habeas petition to the court. Accordingly, petitioner's motion is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BEDFORD v. STATE
(Sep 4, 2007)