Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

SUMANA BASU-DUGAN, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

ORDER

THOMAS SCHROEDER, District Judge

On February 25, 2008, the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation was filed and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. Plaintiff filed objections to the Recommendation within the time limit prescribed by Section 636, and Defendant filed a response.

The Court has made a de novo determination of those portions of the Recommendation to which objections have been made and finds that they do not change the substance of the United States Magistrate Judge's rulings, which are affirmed and adopted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings (Doc. 10) is DENIED, that Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings (Doc. 13) is GRANTED, that the Commissioner's decision be AFFIRMED, and that this action be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED. A judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BASU-DUGAN v. ASTRUE
(Aug 8, 2008)