AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

NICHOLAS SAUCIER and JASON SAUCIER PLAINTIFFS v. BRIDGESTONE/FIRESTONE NORTH AMERICAN TIRE, L.L.C. f/k/a BRIDGESTONE/FIRESTONE, INC.; MAZDA MOTOR OF AMERICA, INC.; and FORD MOTOR COMPANY DEFENDANTS.

ORDER GRANTING PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

DAVID BRAMLETTE III, District Judge

Motions for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Ford Motor Company (Ford) and Mazda Motor of America, Inc. (Mazda) ( Docs. 50, 57) on the Plaintiffs' breach of warranty claim (First Claim) and Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act claim (Second Claim) are before the Court. The motions raise the statute of limitations as a defense. The Plaintiffs have notified the Court that they do not oppose the motions.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:

1. Ford's and Mazda's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment ( Doc. 50) on the Plaintiffs' breach of warranty claim (First Claim) and Motion for Partial Summary Judgment ( Doc. 57) on the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act claim (Second Claim) are granted.

2. Ford and Mazda are granted partial summary judgment on the Plaintiffs' breach of warranty claim (First Claim) and Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act claim (Second Claim) because the claims are barred by the statute of limitations.

3. The Plaintiffs' other claims remain pending.

SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SAUCIER v. BRIDGESTONE/FIRESTONE NORTH A. TIRE
(Dec 16, 2008)