AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

Randal R. Steen, Petitioner, v. Timothy Schuetzle, Respondent.

ORDER

CHARLES MILLER JR., Magistrate Judge

The Eighth Circuit granted the Petitioner's appeal, reversing this court's order dismissing the Petitioner's 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition as untimely and remanding for further proceedings.

The court, without passing on its merits, therefore ORDERS that the Respondent file an answer with the court within sixty (60) days from the date of this Order. Respondent's answer shall comply with the requirements of Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Court. The Clerk of Court is directed to serve the Respondent with copies of the petition in accordance with Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration (Docket No. 7) and Motion to Remand (Docket No. 11) are MOOT.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STEEN v. SCHUETZLE
(Jun 1, 2009)