Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

In re: DAVID B. McKAY, Chapter 13, Debtor.

ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

ARTHUR BRISKMAN, Bankruptcy Judge

This matter came before the Court on the confirmation hearing on the Amended Chapter 13 Plan (Doc. No. 31) and the Motion to Pay Living Expenses (Doc. No. 80) filed by the Debtor David B. McKay and the Order to Show Cause entered by the Court on January 6, 2010 (Doc. No. 86). A hearing was held on February 2, 2010 at which the Debtor, his counsel, counsel for the Chapter 13 Trustee Laurie K. Weatherford, and counsel for the Estate of Patricia A. McKay and McKay Properties, LLC (collectively, "Respondents") appeared.

The Order to Show Cause directed Respondents to show cause why they should not be held in contempt of Court for their failure to comply with the December 9, 2009 Order (Doc. No. 76) and why sanctions should not be imposed against them for alleged violations of the automatic stay. The Court, pursuant to the Order to Show Cause and the Order entered on January 19, 2010 (Doc. No. 93), directed the Respondents to file additional evidence as to specific matters.

The Respondents fully complied with the Court's January 6 and January 19, 2010 Orders by filing detailed responses (Doc. Nos. 87, 92, 96, and 97). They have not violated the December 9, 2009 Order and are not in contempt of Court. The Order to Show Cause is due to be discharged.

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that Estate of Patricia A. McKay and McKay Properties, LLC have fully complied with the December 9, 2009, January 6, 2010, and January 19, 2010 Orders and the January 6, 2010 Order to Show Cause (Doc. No. 86) is hereby DISCHARGED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE McKAY
(Feb 3, 2010)