AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

HITACHI MEDICAL SYSTEMS AMERICA, INC., PLAINTIFF, v. DANIEL BRANCH et al., DEFENDANTS.

ORDER

SARA LIOI, District Judge

Before the Court is the report and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge in the above-entitled action issued on September 14, 2010. Under the explicit terms of that report and recommendation, and in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of this Court: "ANY OBJECTIONS to this Report and Recommendation must be filed with the Clerk of Court within fourteen (14) days of service of this notice." (Doc. No. 173 at 24) (citing Fed.R.Civ.P. 72: L. R. 72.3). In this case, the fourteen-day period has elapsed, and no objections have been filed. The failure to file written objections to a Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation constitutes a waiver of a de novo determination by the district court of an issue covered in the report. Thomas v. Arn, 728 F.2d 813 (6th Cir. 1984), aff'd, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); see United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981); see also L.R. 72.3(b).

The Court has reviewed the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation (Doc. No. 173) and adopts the same. Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction (Doc. No. 41) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 7, 2010

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HITACHI MEDICAL SYSTEMS AMERICA, INC. v. BRANCH (N.D.Ohio 10-7-2010)
(Oct 7, 2010)