The Appellate Term erred in directing judgment in favor of the landlord because the Civil Court had directed judgment for the tenant at the close of the landlord's case but before the tenant put forward her affirmative proof. By reversing and directing a verdict for the landlord, the Appellate Term deprived the tenant of an opportunity to put forward any proof ( see CPLR 4401; Vera v Knolls Ambulance Serv., 160 AD2d 494, 496).
The landlord's continued demand for payment of past amounts due that had been settled as of November 30, 2005, created an issue of fact as to whether the tenant was entitled to apply the money paid toward that settlement to her rent from that date forward ( see Computer Possibilities Unlimited v Mobil Oil Corp., 301 AD2d 70, 80, lv denied 100 NY2d 504).
As petitioner is no longer a prevailing party, it is not entitled to attorney's fees.
[Prior Case History: 21 Misc 3d 145(A), 2008 NY Slip Op 52535(U).]