Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. KEVIN CAHILL, Defendant.

ORDER

HENRY AUTREY, District Judge

This matter comes before the Court upon the Defendant's Motion to Continue Trial Setting [Doc. #124] and Waiver of Speedy Trial [Doc. 91].

This Court, upon careful consideration of the motion of Defendant, and on review of the record, finds that the ends of justice would best be served by continuing the trial setting as to Defendant Kevin Cahill to May 9, 2011, and that a continuance of these proceedings outweighs the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Furthermore, failure to grant a continuance would deny counsel for the Defendant and the Government the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.

Defendant has previously filed with this Court a signed Waiver of Speedy Trial under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, [Doc. #91].

Concluding that the administration of justice will best be served by continuing this case, the Court will reset trial in this proceeding.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the trial setting as to Defendant Kevin Cahill is RESET to May 9, 2011, at 9:30 a.m.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

U.S. v. CAHILL
(Apr 1, 2011)