AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

In the Matter of STEVEN M. McFADDEN, Appellant, v. JAMES JOHN McFADDEN, Respondent. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of STEVEN M. McFADDEN, Appellant,

Ordered that the orders are reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the petitions are reinstated, and the matters are remitted to the Family Court, Kings County, for further proceedings consistent herewith.

The factual allegations contained in the petitions were sufficient to allege family offenses enumerated in Family Court Act § 812 (1) ( see Family Ct Act § 812 [a]; Matter of Testman v Roman, 78 AD3d 719, 720, lv denied 16 NY3d 703; cf. Matter of Vasciannio v Nedrick, 305 AD2d 420, 421; Matter of Davis v Venditto, 45 AD3d 837, 838). Accordingly, the Family Court erred in denying the petitions and dismissing the proceedings.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE McFADDEN
(Apr 19, 2011)