AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

Vance V. Frame, Plaintiff, v. Cal-Western Recon

ORDER

JAMES TEILBORG, District Judge

After consideration of the pending motions, the Court rules as follows:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Extend Time Within Which to Respond to Motions to Dismiss (Dkt. 46) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Plaintiff's request for an open-ended extension pending a decision on the loan modification is denied. Plaintiff shall file a response to the pending motions to dismiss (Dkt. 26 27) no later than Friday, June 3, 2011. No further extensions will be permitted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Consent to Withdraw (Dkt. 43) is DENIED without prejudice. Plaintiff's counsel may renew the request to withdraw after counsel has responded to the pending motions to dismiss. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in connection with the extension of time in which Plaintiff may respond to the pending motions to dismiss, the Motion for Summary Adjudication of Defendant Cal-Western Reconveyance Corporation's Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 44) is DENIED without prejudice.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

FRAME v. CAL-WESTERN RECONVEYANCE CORPORATION
(May 25, 2011)