Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Advocates
Judges
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    Sachin Chaudhary v. Priyanka Chaudhary

    HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

    MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 13444 of 2025 Court No. - 5

    HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.

    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.

    2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief:

    "Direct the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Noida, Gautam Budh Nagar to decide the application dated 17.02.2025 under Section 26 Hindu Marriage Act filed by plaintiff-petitioner in Case No. 493/2022 (Sachin Chaudhary Vs. Priyanka Chaudhary) under Section 13 (1) (ia) of Hindu Marriage Act, pending before him expeditiously within stipulated period fixed by this Hon'ble Court."

    3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the aforesaid application under Section 26 of Hindu Marriage Act is pending consideration and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously.

    4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.

    5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Principal Judge, Family Court, Noida, Versus

    Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amit Kumar

    Counsel for Respondent(s) :

    Sachin Chaudhary

    .....Petitioner(s)

    Priyanka Chaudhary

    .....Respondent(s)

    1

    Gautam Budh Nagar to consider and decide the aforesaid application, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the concerned parties as well as giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment.

    November 6, 2025

    Ved Prakash A227 No. 13444 of 2025

    2

    (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.)

    2

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Sachin Chaudhary v. Priyanka Chaudhary
    (Nov 6, 2025)