Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Advocates
Judges
Acts
  • Order XXXIX Rule 1 & 2 of C.P.C. (7C Application)
  • 39 rule 1 & 2 read with section 151 C.P.C.
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Advocates
Judges
Acts
  • Order XXXIX Rule 1 & 2 of C.P.C. (7C Application)
  • 39 rule 1 & 2 read with section 151 C.P.C.
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    Navneet Kumar Singh v. Hasan Imam And 3 Others

    HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

    MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 11948 of 2025

    Court No. - 9

    HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.

    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.

    2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief:

    " 1. Direct the learned Civil Judge (S.D.) Aligarh to decide the interim injunction

    application 7C under order 39 rule 1 & 2 read with section 151 C.P.C. arising out of

    O.S. No. 725 of 2023 (Navneet Kumar vs Hasan Imam and other) pending in the court

    of Civil Judge (S.D.) Aligarh, expeditiously preferably within stipulated period."

    3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for 

    interim  injunction under Order XXXIX Rule 1 & 2 of C.P.C. (7C Application) is

    pending since 2023 and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been

    fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously.

    4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition

    pending.

    5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the

    Civil Judge (S.D.) Aligarh  to consider and decide the aforementioned interim

    injunction application (7C Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously,

    preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified

    copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the opposite parties, giving

    opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary

    adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. September 26, 2025 Nitika Sri.

    Versus

    Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sumant Rai Counsel for Respondent(s) :

    (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.)

    Navneet Kumar Singh .....Petitioner(s)

    Hasan Imam And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)

      1. 2025-09-26T14:43:05+0530
      2. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Navneet Kumar Singh v. Hasan Imam And 3 Others
    (Sep 26, 2025)