Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Advocates
Judges
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    ROSHANLAL v. NARENDRA GARG

    HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT

    JODHPUR

    S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 1075/2023 Roshanlal S/o Late Shri Jankilal, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Post Kunwaliya, P.s. And Tehsil Gangrar, Distt. Chittorgarh (Raj.) ----Appellant

    Versus

    Narendra Garg S/o Radheshyam Garg, R/o Shitala Mata Ka Chowk, Near Water Tank, Inside Railway Gate, Chanderiya, P.s. Chanderiya, Tehsil And Distt. Chittorgarh (Raj.) ----Respondent

    For Appellant(s) : Mr. Anuj Sahlot

    Mr. Digvijay Singh Chouhan

    For Respondent(s) : Mr. Bharat Shrimali

    HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR Order

    11/09/2024

    1. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that this is victim's appeal against judgment of acquittal.

    2. This matter arises out of judgment dated 25.04.2019 passed in Regular Criminal Case No.2018/2018.

    3. The victim has approached this Court under Section 378(4) CrPC for leave to file an appeal against judgment of acquittal. The victim has substantive right to file appeal against acquittal as per proviso to Section 372 CrPC, which was considered by a three judges Bench of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Mallikarjun Kodagali Vs. State of Karnataka & Ors. reported in (2019) 2 SCC 752 and in other subsequent judgments.

    4. Though leave has already been granted by a Coordinate Bench of this Court, however, the parties would loose a forum in

    1

    (2 of 2)

    [CRLAS-1075/2023] the event of any order passed by the regular appellate forum for or against. Therefore, this appeal is permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to file appeal before the District Judge concerned.

    5. In the circumstance, prayer for withdrawal is allowed.

    6. Accordingly, this criminal appeal stands disposed of as withdrawn.

    7. If the appeal is filed within 30 days from today, the appellate court shall consider that the appellant was bonafidely prosecuting the matter before this Court; while considering the prayer for condonation of delay.

    8. Lower court record be sent back.

    (BIRENDRA KUMAR),J

    45-deep/-

    2

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    ROSHANLAL v. NARENDRA GARG
    (Sep 11, 2024)