AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Advocates
Judges
Acts
  • Section 138 of N.I. Act, Police Station
  • Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Advocates
Judges
Acts
  • Section 138 of N.I. Act, Police Station
  • Section 482 Cr.P.C.
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    The Agrawal Tubewell Co. v. State Of U.P. And 3 Others

    Court No. - 72

    Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 35570 of 2019

    Applicant :- The Agrawal Tubewell Co. Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Amod Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

    Hon'ble Rajiv Joshi,J.

    Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A.G.A.

    The instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed to direct the Additional Court, Varanasi to consider and decide the Complaint No. 1372 of 2018, Case No. 1102 of 2018 ( The Agrawal Tubewell Vs. Agrim Infracon Pvt. Ltd.), under Section 138 of N.I. Act, Police Station -Sigra, District- Varanasi as expeditiously as possible preferably within the time stipulated.

    The contention is that a complaint under Section 138 of the N.I. Act, lodged by the applicant is pending before the court concerned since 2018, even though dates are being fixed at regular intervals, no tangible progress is made, which is virtually defeating the legislative mandate of Section 143(3) of the Act, which provides that the trial of such offences, shall be conducted as expeditiously as possible and an endeavour shall be made to conclude the trial within six months from the date of filing of the complaint.

    The judgments of the Apex Court in the cases of Indian Bank Association and others v. Union of India and others, (2014) 5 SCC 590 and J.V. Baharuni and another v. State of Gujarat and another, 2014 SCC 494 (para-61) also affirm the said mandate.

    The learned Magistrate shall ensure that the proceedings of the complaint case are taken to its logical conclusion as expeditiously as possible.

    Adjournments, if any, shall be for very strong and compelling reasons, to be recorded in writing, else would attract a cost of not less than Rs.300/- per date.

    The compliance be reported to this Court.

    Subject to aforesaid, this application is disposed of.

    Order Date :- 25.9.2019/Akbar

    Neutral Citation No. - 2019:AHC:157638

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    The Agrawal Tubewell Co. v. State Of U.P. And 3 Others
    (Sep 25, 2019)